The University Student’s Motivation Level on Learning English

Authors

  • Esmira Mehdiyev Departmant of Education, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey Author
  • Celal Teyyar Uğurlu Departmant of Education, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey Author
  • Gonca Usta Departmant of Education, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v7i1.p130-134

Keywords:

Language Learning, Motivation Scale, Level of Motivation

Abstract

This study aims to determine the university students’ level of motivation in terms of different variables. A study group of this research has been designed through one of the non-random sampling methods, Using appropriate sampling, 606 students from Faculty of Education of C.U. have been involved in this study. Motivation scale in English Language Learning developed by Mehdiyev,Usta,U?urlu (2015) was used as an instrument of data collection. T-test and one - way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to resolve problems of this research. As a result of the research the motivation level of university students hasn’t been revealed significantly different regarding to the gender variable. However, considering the t-test results of motivation scale dimensions, confidence, attitude and personal use, significant difference is seen in favour of women in personal use dimension. The level of language learning motivation of female students is higher than men’s regarding to personal use dimension. However, men’s and women’s views don’t differ significantly in attitude and confidence dimensions. University students don’t present significant differences in terms of birth place, parent’s education level, total motivation scores and confident, attitude and personal dimensions. Students’ motivation levels are seen not to be influenced by the places such as village, provision or city where they have spent the most of their lifetime. At the same time the findings revealed that parental status variable in terms of primary, secondary and university graduates has no effects on students’ motivation.

References

Ellis, R. (1994). The study second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hurst, E. (2015). Ellen Hurst (2015). The thing that kill us’: student perspectives on language support in a South African university. Teaching in Higher Education, 20 (1), 78-91. DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2014.957269

Mehdiyev, Usta ve U?urlu (2015). The impact of Content-based Instruction on language learning motivation and learning difficulties.Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Project, Sivas.

Nizkodubov, G. Zyubanov, V. ve Johnson, A.V. (2015). The socio-psychological difficulties of learning the English language in the context of lifelong education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 206, 210 – 214.

Lightbown, P.M. ve Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. (Fourth Edition), Oxford University Press. Access adress: http://tr.scribd.com/doc/47136503/Lightbown-Spada quoted on 20/01/2015 .

Williams, M. & Burden, R.L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Downloads

Published

2017-08-25