The Prospect of Implementing Safety Education in Malaysian Primary Schools: from the Perspective of School Administrators

Authors

  • Khamsiah Ismai Department of Psychology, International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Muhamad Farhan Mohamad Shukri Department of Psychology, International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Mastura Badzis Department of Psychology, International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Ssekamanya Siraje Abdallah Department of Psychology, International Islamic University Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v6i2.p45-67

Keywords:

safety management, safety practices, school safety

Abstract

Despite of the various attempts to implement safety practices in school, there still many unresolved issues related to students’ safety in schools. This study aimed to explore and examine current safety management practices in Malaysian primary schools and the type of safety management plans adopted by the administrators for ensuring students’ safety. The sample of this study consisted of 141 School Headmasters and Deputy Headmasters (Administration and Curriculum, Student Affairs or Co-curriculum), randomly selected from 138 primary schools in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, Malaysia. Quantitative methods were used and the data of school administrators’ attitude and stances in implementation of safety management practices were gathered using a set questionnaire. The data was then tabulated, summarized and evaluated to draw conclusions from them, using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS). Results from the study indicated that there was a strong positive attitude among school administrators in relation to safety management plan and policy practices in school. Teachers’ and staffs’ participation and parental and community involvement are significantly and positively predicted by school administrators’ commitment and communication; as well as safety education, training and campaign at schools. Some of the safety practices investigated in the study were not observed in schools due to increasing workload and responsibilities of teachers and their time availability. Safety practices at the schools mostly depended on the issues that are considered as important by the respective schools. As the implication of this study, some recommendations were made to help schools to improve safety practices at school and promote cooperation between school administrators, teachers, parents and community as a whole. The study also implied that implementation of safety management education in Malaysian primary school has a good prospect.

References

Abdullah, S. A. (2006). Amalan Pengetua Dalam Pengurusan Keselamatan Sekolah - Satu Kajian Kes(Unpublished Master’s thesis). University Malaya, Malaysia.

Clarke, S. G. and Cooper, C. L. (2004) Managing the Risk of Workplace Stress: Health and Safety Hazards (London/ New York: Routledge)

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4thed. ). New Jersey: Pearson.

Frumkin, H. , Geller, R. J. , & Rubin, I. L. (2006). Safe and Healthy School Environments. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (4thed. ). USA: Macmillan.

Gay, L. R. , & Airasian, P. (2014). Educational Research: Competencies for analysis and application (10th ed. ). Boston: Pearson.

Idris, N. (2008). Students Perceptions of School’s Safety (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Kitamura, Y. (2014). The possibility of holistic safety education in Japan: From the perspective of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). IATSS Research, Vol. 38 (1), July 2014, pp. 40–47. doi:10. 1016/j. iatssr. 2014. 05. 004

Lee, T. & Harrison, K. (2000). Assessing safety culture in nuclear power stations. Safety Science, 34 (1-3), 61-97.

Lister, J. (2010). Types of safety managements system. Retrieved Mac, 2014, from http://www. ehow. com/list_6966076_types-safety-management-systems. html

Lutchman, C. , Maharaj, R. , & Ghanem, W. (2012). Safety Management: A comprehensive Approach to Developing a Sustainable System. USA: Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Mahadi, S. A. (2000). Students’ Perceptions of School Safety – a Study of Two High-Risk Schools in the Sentul Zone (Unpublished Master’s thesis). International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

Mearns, K. , Whitaker, S. M. , & Flin, R. (2003). Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Safety Science, 41 (8), 641-680.

Ministry of Education. (1988). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 8/1988 (Keselamatan Diri Pelajar Di Sekolah). (KP [BS] 8591/Jld. III/ [10]). Damansara, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ministry of Education. (1999). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 8/1999: Keselamatan Diri Murid Dalam Perjalanan Pergi Dan Balik Sekolah. (KP [BS] 8591/Jilid XV/ [8]). Damansara Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ministry of Education. (2000). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 6/2000: Menangani Masalah Keselamatan, Dadah Dan Gengster. (KP [BS] 8591/Jld. XVI [6]). Damansara, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ministry of Education. (2000). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 7/2000: Mencegah Kebakaran Di Sekolah. (KP [BS] 8591/Jld. XVI [7]). Damansara, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ministry of Education. (2002). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 4/2002: Pelaksanaan Program Sekolah Selamat. (KP [BS] 8591/Jld. XVIII [4]). Damansara, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ministry of Education. (2009). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 8/2009: Langkah-langkah Keselamatan Semasa Mengikuti Aktiviti/Program Lawatan Di Luar Waktu Persekolahan. (KP[BPSH-SPDK] 201/005/01/ [27]). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ministry of Education. (2011). Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bilangan 8 Tahun 2011: Pengurusan Keselamatan Murid Di Sekolah. (SPI:KP[BPSH-SPDK]201/005/01/Jld. 4[11]). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ministry of Education. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025: Preschool to Post Secondary Education. (ISBN 978-983-3444-54-0). Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation. (2005). Best Practices For Schools. Retrieved Mac, 2014, from http://www. ohiobwc. com/downloads/blankpdf/PublicSchools. pdf

Phipott, D. , & Kuenstle, M. W. (2007). Education Facility Security Handbook. UK: The Scarecrow Press Inc.

Purkey, W. W. (1999), Creating Safe Schools through Invitational Education, ERIC Digest No. ED435946.

Reeves, M. A. , Kanan, L. M. , & Plog, A. E. (2010). Comprehensive Planning for Safe Learning Environments: A School Professional’s Guide to Integrating Physical and Psychological Safety – Prevention. Through Recovery

Saarani, J. (2014). Keberkesanan Program Kesedaran Keselamatan Maklumat CYBERSAFE Dalam Kalangan Guru Pra Perkhidmatan (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Salkind, N. J. (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. LA: SAGE

Shamsuri, N. (2008). Peranan Kepimpinan Pengetua Dalam Pelaksanaan Peraturan Keselamatan Sekolah (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University Malaya, Malaysia.

Suid, S. (2004). Pedestrian Access Audit at Primary School – A Study on Users’ Safety (Unpublished Master’s thesis). International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

Tie, F. H. (2014). Strategic tripartite alliance in establishing a safe school programme in Malaysia. In OECD. School safety and security - lessons in danger. United States of America: OECD Publishing

UNICEF Malaysia. (2012). Child protection - safety from injuries. Retrieved November 2015 from http://www. unicef. org/malaysia/protection_9007. html.

Xaxx, J. (2010). Four principles of a safety management system. Retrieved Mac, 2014, from http://www. ehow. com/list_7438631_four-principles-safety-management-system. html

Downloads

Published

2016-12-30

How to Cite

The Prospect of Implementing Safety Education in Malaysian Primary Schools: from the Perspective of School Administrators. (2016). European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 3(3), 37-71. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v6i2.p45-67