The ESP Technology-Supported Learning Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v6i1.p146-153Keywords:
ESP, modern technology, learning environment, pilot studyAbstract
This paper discusses the implementation of computers and the Internet technology in the learning environment within the ESP context. Designing and implementing digital technology in the teaching and learning process is one of the most demanding tasks. The use of technologies in the ESP classroom enables students to be active and collaborative, which contributes to improving learning achievements and increasing learning outcomes. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of learning experiences, as well as to produce a highly social and authentic, supportive and productive learning environment that allows students the construction of relevant knowledge. The study examines students’ perceptions towards the implementation of digital technologies in the classroom. The results of the research show that students have very positive attitudes towards computers and the Internet technologies and their integration in the ESP learning environment.References
Bransford, D. J., Brown, L. A., & Cocking, R., eds. (2000). “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School”. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning Research and Educational Practice, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.
Brown, J., Seely., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989): “Situated cognition and the culture of learning”. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butler-Pascoe, M. & Wiburg, K. M. (2003). Technology and Teaching English Language Learners. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and Education. New York: Free Press.
Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D.H. (1991). “Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology?” Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-11.
Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996):. “Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction”. D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Educational communications and technology, New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 170-199.
Dunlap, J, C. & Grabinger, S. (1996). “Ric Environments for Active Learning in Higher Education”. Constructivist Learning Models in Higher Education. B.G. Wilson (ED.) Englewood Cliffs NJ, Educational Technology Publications.
Huchinson, T, & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (1994). “Thinking technology: Towards a Constructivist Design Model”. Educational Technology. 34-37.
Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996): “Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools”. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, 1st edition. New York: Macmillan, 693-719.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). “Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments”. In Jonassen, D. H., & Land, S. M. (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 89-121.
Kimball, J.. (1998). "Task-based medical English: elements for Internet-assisted language learning." Call Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 411-418. http://www.fauxpress.com/kimball/res/task.htm
Lee, L. (2000). “Using Internet to enhance foreignlanguage teaching and learning”. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.unh.edu/spanish/lina/internet1.html.
Orr. T. (1998). “ESP for Japanese Universities: A Guide for Intelligent Reform”, The Language Teacher Online. http://www.jalt-publications.org/tlt/files/98/nov/orr.htm
Perkins, D. (1991). “Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage?” Educational Technology, 31(5), 18-23.
Piaget, J. (1968). Structuralism. New York: Harper and Row.
Reeves, T..C.. & Herrington R. O. (2002). "Authentic activities and online learning". In A. Goody, J. Herrington & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25, 562-567.
http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/main/papers/ref/pdf/Reeves.pdf
Rogers, A. (2005). Student voice: Bridges to learning. Seattle: University of Washington. Online.
Vygotsky, L.. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wilson B, G. (Ed.). (2004). “Constructivist learning environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design”. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Young L.D. (2003). “Bridging Theory and Practice: Developing Guidelines to Facilitate the Design of Computer-based Learning Environments”. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 29(3).
Živkovi?, S. (2011). Modernization of English as Foreign Language Studies in University Education. Second International Scientific Conference: University Education in Transition, Transition in University Education – Modern and Universal. Belgrade. Higher Education Institution for Applied Studies for Entrepreneurialship.
Živkovi?, S. (2013). To Modernize or not to Modernize - There is no Question. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. MCSER Publishing: Rome-Italy.
Živkovi?, S. (2014). Constructivism – An Emerging Trend in ESP Teaching and Learning. Language, Literature and Culture in Education. Nitra, Slovakia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 European Journal of Social Science Education and Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
