Functional Literacy and Text Creation

Authors

  • Dusanka Popovic Faculty of Philosophy, University of Montenegro, Niksic, Montenegro Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v1i1.p95-105

Keywords:

functional literacy, text creation, oral and written expression, efficient teaching.

Abstract

The results of research about functional literacy (i.e. ability to read, understand and create text and understand its further use), and especially those results that 15-year-olds show in Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), as well as the importance of this competence for life and work in a modern society, indicate the need for analysis of all the segments that affect its development and improvement. Project How to help students to successfully create oral and written, artistic and non-artistic texts addresses this area in particular. The culture of oral and written expression, as productive language skills, is very interesting to research, and especially to improve. Inseparable from the receptive skills of listening and reading, they are their explicit product. A significant number of theorists and methodologists dealt with this area, but their activity was usually focused on what the teacher needed to do for the students to write well (focused on the process, method, or the result: students' written work). What is unquestionably lacking, but is in the spirit of the changes that we have introduced in our educational system, is dealing with the student as a creator of the text. The observations of methodologists of language and literature teaching prove that this factor in teacher-student-written work conjunction was least dealt with. They point out that the main characteristic of the current literature on the written expression is exaggerated orientation towards written works and neglecting of their authors (creators). The aim of the project was to investigate and recommend the best ways in which to build a functional literacy in the area of successful creation of oral and written text, i.e. to propose a more efficient teaching in the field of oral and written expression. This paper analyzes the opportunities for the development of these areas, providing current educational programs for Mother tongue language and literature in Montenegro, and presents the methodical approach The Creator's path designed as a means of support for all students when creation of text is in question.

References

Booth, D. & Swartz, L. (2004): Literacy Techniques, Ontario, Canada: Pembroke Publishers Limited.

Burke Walsh, K. (1996): Creating child-centered classrooms, 6-7 Year Olds, Step By Step: A Program for Children and Families. Children's Resources International, Inc., Washington, DC; Open Society Inst., New York, NY.

Burke Walsh, K. (1997): Creating child-centered classrooms, 8-10 Year Olds, A Program for Children and Families Children's Resources International, Inc., Washington, DC; Open Society Inst., New York, NY.

Grosman, M. (2010): U obranu ?itanja, ?itatelj i književnost u 21. Stolje?u, Zagreb: Facta.

Dimitrijevi?, R. (1969): Osnovi teorije pismenosti, prera?eno i dopunjeno izdanje, Beograd: „Vuk Karadži?“

Durkovi?, N., Kova?evi?, I. i dr (2006): Studija: Republi?ko testiranje obrazovnih postignu?a u?enika/ca III razreda osnovne škole iz maternjeg jezika i matematike, Podgorica: Zavod za školstvo.

European Commission (2011): Teaching Reading in Europe, Contexts, Policies and Practices, Brussels: EACEA P9 Eurydice.

Ja?imovi?, Ž.: Prezentacija PISA 2009: Postignu?a naših u?enika u programu me?unarodnog testiranja, sajt Ispitnog centra Crne Gore: http://www.iccg.co.me/

Jovanovi?, V. (2011): Faktori napredovanja na testu ?itala?ke pismenosti, Psihološka istraživanja, Vol. XIV (2), 135–155.

Campbell, R.J., Kelly, D.L., Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Sainsbury, M. (2001): Framework and Specification for PIRLS Assessment 2001, Boston: Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

Ili?, P. (1998): Srpski jezik i književnost u nastavnoj teoriji i praksi, Novi Sad: Zmaj.

Kirsh, I., de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., Monseur, C. (2002): Reading for Change: Performance and Engagement across Countries, Paris: OECD Publications.

Kvaš?ev, R. (1974): Razvijanje stvarala?kih sposobnosti kod u?enika, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva

Kvaš?ev, R. (1977): Kako razviti stvarala?ke sposobnosti, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva

Leši?, Z. (2008): Teorija književnosti, Beograd: „Službeni glasnik“

Marinkovi?, S. (2000): Metodika kreativne nastave srpskog jezika i književnosti, Beograd: Kreativni centar

Nikoli?, M. (2009): Metodika nastave srpskog jezika i književnosti, 5. dopunjeno izdanje, Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike

Ministarstvo prosvjete i nauke (2008): Nacionalni izvještaj o postignu?ima u?enika u okviru programa za me?unarodno testiranje u?enika – PISA 2006, Podgorica: Ministarstvo prosvjete i nauke, OECD, FOSI.

Pavlovi? Babi?, D., Baucal, A. (2010): ?itala?ka pismenost kao mera kvaliteta obrazovanja: procena na osnovu PISA 2009 podataka, Psihološka istraživanja, Vol. XIII 2, 241–260.

Rosandi?, D. (2005): Metodika književnog odgoja, Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Stevanovi?, M. (1988): Teorija i praksa u nastavi umenog i pismenog izražavanja, Gornji Milanovac: De?je novine

Street, B. V. (1993a). (Ed.). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Street, B. V. (1993b). The new literacy studies: Guest editorial. Journal of Research in Reading, 16(2), 81-97.

Havelka, N. i tim istraživa?a (2001): Istraživanje obrazovnih postignu?a u?enika osmog razreda iz pet osnovnih škola u Crnoj Gori, u: Sveobuhvatna analiza sistema osnovnog obrazovanja u SRJ, Beograd: UNICEF.

Visinko, K. (2010): Jezi?no izražavane u nastavi hrvatskog jezika. Pisanje, Zagreb: Školska knjiga

Zavod za školstvo, Ispitni centar Crne Gore (2013): PISA – Crna Gora, Preliminarni izvještaj, Podgorica: Zavod za školstvo, Ispitni centar Crne Gore

Živkovi?, D. (2001): Teorija književnosti sa teorijom pismenosti, Beograd: „Dragani?“

Downloads

Published

2022-09-09